0
Stenka25 Posted 10 years ago
Vocabulary

On the putative 'should'

The passage below comes from The pilgrimage by Paulo Coelho.

‘The Road to Santiago is about to end,’ said my guide, ‘and since our reality is a lot more similar to these railroad cars, stinking of oil, than to the bucolic retreats we have encountered during our journey, it is better that today’s conversation happen here.’

I'd like to ask a question regarding the underlined 'happen'.
It seems to be the type of the omission of the putative 'should' before 'happen'.
Am I right?

One more question.
Is the sentence possible with 'happens' not 'happen'?

Regards.
  

Top answer

Stenka25 Am I right? No. It is subjunctive mood.

  • Stenka25 Am I right?
  • No.
  • It is subjunctive mood.
  • html Stenka25 Is the sentence possible with 'happens' not 'happen'?
  • Yes.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

6 Answers
0
Stenka25Am I right?
No. It is subjunctive mood.

http://www.englishpage.com/minitutorials/subjunctive.html
Stenka25Is the sentence possible with 'happens' not 'happen'?
Yes.
0
Thanks a lot as always, AlpheccaStars.

The site below says subjuncative 'should' is also called putative 'should', though.
http://grammar.about.com/od/pq/g/Putative-Should.htm

In addition, putative should (also called attitudinal "should" or subjunctive "s
0
There is not much emotional content in the quotation, nor are there intensifying expressions. I wouldn't give it a label of "putative should," but if it helps you learn the elusive (and declining) subjunctive mood, then I can't argue with you.

As noted by Randolph Quirk et al., putative should (also called emotional "should") occurs in that clauses "after expressions of emotion (sor
0
Stenka25It seems to be the type of the omission of the putative 'should' before 'happen'.
Yes. Putative 'should' is also called evaluative 'should', by the way, and the construction with 'should' is sometimes called the periphrastic subjunctive. Without 'should' it's the present subjunctive or the mandative construction.

Lots of names for the same t
0
Thanks a lot for your follow-up reply, AlpheccaStarsEmotion: smile
0
Thanks a lot for giving me the chance to have a deeper understanding of this usage, CJEmotion: smile

Related Questions