0
Marix998 Posted 14 years ago
Grammar

On the one hand, Margot had teared up at the moment of my departure, confessing that she was (had been) afraid she would never see me again. //past perfect issue//

Hello,

I have been reading a book called Invisible by P. Auster and I have a question about past perfect used in the paragraph below. 

I don't know why the author used the past perfect only where it is written in bold. I added the verbs written in italic where I would have used the past perfect as well.

Perhaps it could be a past perfect simplification past perfect -> past simple but in this case to move to the past of past would be enough with Margot had teared up continuing with past simple only.   

It was a dismal end to what had been such a momentous time for me, and I left the apartment feeling shattered, perplexed and perhaps a little angry as well. For days afterward, I kept going over that final conversation, and the more I analyzed it the less sense it made to me. On the one hand, Margot had teared up at the moment of my departure, confessing that she was (had been) afraid she would never see me again. That would suggest she (had wanted) wanted our fling to go on, but when I (had proposed) proposed that we (had began) be­gin meeting at my apartment, she had become hesitant, all but telling me it wouldn't be possible. I (had had) had no idea what that meant. Then she had started talking about Born, which quickly devolved into a muddle of contradictions and conflicting desires. She (had been) was worried that he was going to kick her out, but a second later that (had seemed) seemed to be exactly what she (had wanted) wanted. Even more, perhaps she (had been) was going to take the initia­tive and leave him herself. 

Many thanks

m
  

Top answer

The author establishes that the "teared up" (a neologism) occurred prior to the previous actions/events in the Past Tense. Once you establish the new time frame with Past Perfect, and the sequence of subsequent events is in the correct order with regard to time, the Past Tense is used. " where we have a Past Tense verb followed by a Present Tense verb.

  • The author establishes that the "teared up" (a neologism) occurred prior to the previous actions/events in the Past Tense.
  • Once you establish the new time frame with Past Perfect, and the sequence of subsequent events is in the correct order with regard to time, the Past Tense is used.
  • " where we have a Past Tense verb followed by a Present Tense verb.
  • The time frame has changed.
  • instead of continuing in the Past Tense, she again uses the Past Perfect in the next sentence.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

3 Answers
0
The author establishes that the "teared up" (a neologism) occurred prior to the previous actions/events in the Past Tense.

Once you establish the new time frame with Past Perfect, and the sequence of subsequent events is in the correct order with regard to time, the Past Tense is used. This the author does until we hit:
..."when I proposed that we begin meeting at my apa
0
Thanks a lot for clearing another usage of the past perfect.

There is an unexpected use of the Past Perfect. The implication is, whew, I’ve made it – I’ve caught the train on time…..now, NOW.. I can concentrate on preparing my report. All that went before is now separated off from the events that are now going to unfold. The 'abrupt' use of the Past Perfect signals some kind of c
0
I am asking because here (as soon as I had found) it looks like that past perfect is used with the idea of completion of event: finding the seat.
Yes - and everything else that went before!!!
That's the complete change the author intends. He's given you the back

Related Questions