0
Vcolts Posted 15 years ago
Grammar
Omission Rule
Ex:
1. It is best to deal with the problem by discussing with experts than non-experts.
2. It is best to deal with the problem by discussing with experts than with non-experts.
Are both sentences above correct?
I keep having these omission rule questions in my head. If somebody knows a webpage that deals with omission rules, I would appreciate it greatly.
Thanks in advance!
1. It is best to deal with the problem by discussing with experts than non-experts.
2. It is best to deal with the problem by discussing with experts than with non-experts.
Are both sentences above correct?
I keep having these omission rule questions in my head. If somebody knows a webpage that deals with omission rules, I would appreciate it greatly.
Thanks in advance!
Top answer
2. It is better to deal with the problem by discussing it with experts than with non-experts. Omission is a matter of whether the remainint text still makes clear sense.
- 2.
- It is better to deal with the problem by discussing it with experts than with non-experts.
- Omission is a matter of whether the remainint text still makes clear sense.
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
3 Answers
0
2. It is better to deal with the problem by discussing it with experts than with non-experts.
Omission is a matter of whether the remainint text still makes clear sense.
Omission is a matter of whether the remainint text still makes clear sense.
00
If the sentence is as you wrote:
It is better to deal with the problem by discussing it with experts than with non-experts.
Is the "with" in RED necessary?
It is better to deal with the problem by discussing it with experts than with non-experts.
Is the "with" in RED necessary?
00
That's why I left it there. Are you unaware that you presented 2 sentences and I chose one of them?
0
Related Questions