0
Usenet Posted 20 years ago
Usage

Number of words to reach fluency?

Does anyone know if there has been a study to show how many words need to be in a person's vocabulary (in any given language) before he/she could be considered fluent (in said language)?
Or, if not, how many words the average adult has in his/her native tongue? Or how many words a child would have (by comparison) at a given age?
Just trying to figure out how many words/phrases one might need to learn in a given language before one might expect to speak it with reasonable fluency, or at least as well as a child might.

Thanks,
MJW
  

Top answer

e. fluency may be better measured by speed and accuracy of response than by the number of words a person knows. Don Phillipson Carlsbad Springs (Ottawa, Canada)

  • e.
  • fluency may be better measured by speed and accuracy of response than by the number of words a person knows.
  • Don Phillipson Carlsbad Springs (Ottawa, Canada)
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

13 Answers
0
[nq:1]Does anyone know if there has been a study to show how many words need to be in a person's vocabulary (in any given language) before he/she could be considered fluent (in said language)?[/nq]
Vocabulary is only one possibe indicator of
knowledge of a language and may be distant
from fluency, i.e. fluency may be better measured
by speed and accuracy of response than by the
0
[nq:1]Does anyone know if there has been a study to show how many words need to be in a person's ... one might expect to speak it with reasonable fluency, or at least as well as a child might. Thanks, MJW[/nq]
Not exactly what you asked, but the US State department has some estimates of classroom hours required for persons of a given ability to reach different degrees of proficiency. I believe
0
[nq:1]Does anyone know if there has been a study to show how many words need to be in a person's vocabulary (in any given language) before he/she could be considered fluent (in said language)?[/nq]
I'll grant that no particular number of words guarantees fluency, and I'll bet you would grant that too.
But there are studies of, I think, all the things you ask about or at least closely relat
0
[nq:1]Does anyone know if there has been a study to show how many words need to be in a person's vocabulary (in any given language) before he/she could be considered fluent (in said language)?[/nq]
This isn't exactly what you're asking, but my personal favorite self-test for fluency in a foreign language is the one I read in a book on creating a résumé: if you aren't willing to conduct the job
0
[nq:1]Does anyone know if there has been a study to show how many words need to be in a person's vocabulary (in any given language) before he/she could be considered fluent (in said language)?[/nq]
Between 3,000 and 4,000.
GFH
0
As I know, this number is about 1500 in English.
0
[nq:1]The number of words needed to get along most of the time, or maybe it was the number of words ... was something like 3000. But many of those words were used only rarely, and maybe different words by different people.[/nq]
At 2, I started counting (and logging) the words my child used. After about a week, it pretty much leveled out at 500, adding just 20 or so on the last day before I sto
0
[nq:2]The number of words needed to get along most of ... used only rarely, and maybe different words by different people.[/nq]
[nq:1]At 2, I started counting (and logging) the words my child used. After about a week, it pretty much leveled ... before I stopped. I agree with you that 3000 is likely to account for much of the remaining 10%. JOE[/nq]
The number of commonly-used characters in
0
[nq:2]The number of words needed to get along most of ... used only rarely, and maybe different words by different people.[/nq]
[nq:1]At 2, I started counting (and logging) the words my child used. After[/nq]
2! Wow. When did you start doing your own taxes?

Oh, your kid was 2. Or you started after he used his 2nd unique word. Either one is easier to believe.
I really did misre
0
[nq:1]**** that Evelyn Woods.[/nq]
Evelyn Wood. No "s".

No need to thank me.

Bob Lieblich
No OY! this time

Related Questions