0
Tinanam0102 Posted 16 years ago
Grammar
Now it may not have to
Hi teachers,
In 2008, when Obama said he might include India in the mandate of his AfPak team, New Delhi raised such hell that the matter was dropped. Thus Richard Holbrooke, the U.S. AfPak envoy, refuses to consider U.S. involvement today.
Yet even he concedes that Kashmir makes Afghanistan "more difficult to resolve,"and Washington simply can't afford to avoid if it hopes to leave the region any time soon.
Now it may not have to. The possible resumption of India-Pakistan talks suggests a growing constituency for peace on both sides.
1. Does "he" refer to Richard Holbrooke?
2. What does "Now it may not have to" mean?
Thank you.
Tinanam
In 2008, when Obama said he might include India in the mandate of his AfPak team, New Delhi raised such hell that the matter was dropped. Thus Richard Holbrooke, the U.S. AfPak envoy, refuses to consider U.S. involvement today.
Yet even he concedes that Kashmir makes Afghanistan "more difficult to resolve,"and Washington simply can't afford to avoid if it hopes to leave the region any time soon.
Now it may not have to. The possible resumption of India-Pakistan talks suggests a growing constituency for peace on both sides.
1. Does "he" refer to Richard Holbrooke?
2. What does "Now it may not have to" mean?
Thank you.
Tinanam
Top answer
Hi, In 2008, when Obama said he might include India in the mandate of his AfPak team, New Delhi raised such **** that the matter was dropped. S. S.
- Hi, In 2008, when Obama said he might include India in the mandate of his AfPak team, New Delhi raised such **** that the matter was dropped.
- S.
- S.
- involvement today.
- Yet even he concedes that Kashmir makes Afghanistan "more difficult to resolve,"and Washington simply can't afford to avoid ( avoid what?
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
4 Answers
0
Hi,
In 2008, when Obama said he might include India in the mandate of his AfPak team, New Delhi raised such **** that the matter was dropped. Thus Richard Holbrooke, the U.S. AfPak envoy, refuses to consider U.S. involvement today.
Yet even he concedes that Kashmir makes Afghanistan "more difficult to resolve,"and Washington simply can't afford to avoid (avoi
In 2008, when Obama said he might include India in the mandate of his AfPak team, New Delhi raised such **** that the matter was dropped. Thus Richard Holbrooke, the U.S. AfPak envoy, refuses to consider U.S. involvement today.
Yet even he concedes that Kashmir makes Afghanistan "more difficult to resolve,"and Washington simply can't afford to avoid (avoi
00
Hi Clive,
Thank you for helping me. I'm sorry the word missing is "it", can't afford to avoid it.
1. Does this "it" refer to "can't afford to avoid that Kashmir makes Afghanistan difficult to resolve"?
2. Would this be a little clear to understand what "Now it may not have to" refers to?
Thank you.
Tinanam
Thank you for helping me. I'm sorry the word missing is "it", can't afford to avoid it.
1. Does this "it" refer to "can't afford to avoid that Kashmir makes Afghanistan difficult to resolve"?
2. Would this be a little clear to understand what "Now it may not have to" refers to?
Thank you.
Tinanam
00
Hi,
I'm sorry the word missing is "it", can't afford to avoid it.
In 2008, when Obama said he might include India in the mandate of his AfPak team, New Delhi raised such **** that the matter was dropped. Thus Richard Holbrooke, the U.S. AfPak envoy, refuses to consider U.S. involvement today.
Yet even he concedes that Kashmir makes Afghanistan "more difficult to reso
I'm sorry the word missing is "it", can't afford to avoid it.
In 2008, when Obama said he might include India in the mandate of his AfPak team, New Delhi raised such **** that the matter was dropped. Thus Richard Holbrooke, the U.S. AfPak envoy, refuses to consider U.S. involvement today.
Yet even he concedes that Kashmir makes Afghanistan "more difficult to reso
00
Related Questions