Is saying, "your sample falls below the action levels and meets the criteria set forth by..." Imagine we tested a sample for cholesterol and arsenic. There is a table that shows cholesterol to be 180 and your arsenic level to be zero (undetectable). The same table show the action levels to be 200 for cholesterol and 1 for arsenic. Originally, I had "your samples met the action levels", which I can see is ambiguous, although the table clearly shows the values of the sample to be less than the action levels.
It is difficult to be completely precise in this kind of writing. It is much better to use short, simple sentences and not combine two ideas into one sentence. Idea #1: falls below the value that indicates an action should be taken.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
It is difficult to be completely precise in this kind of writing. It is much better to use short, simple sentences and not combine two ideas into one sentence.
Idea #1: falls below the value that indicates an action should be taken.
Idea #2: meets some (unspecified) criteria.
For example:
The measurements of both cholesterol and arsenic fell below the level where action