0
Offroad Posted 15 years ago
Grammar

'not to' vs 'to not'

Dear teachers

I've had a hard time understanding why 'to not' is preferable here instead of 'not to':

How do you get the lions to not eat you?

How do you get him to not do that?

I'm given the understanding these sentences should read well:

I advise you not to do that.

I was told not to do that.

I must get him not to do that.

If the last one is not OK, it must have something to do with the verb 'to get'.

Thanks
  

Top answer

Read my post here and see if it will help you to begin to understand the difference in use and meaning of 'to not' and 'not to'. Then ask more questions.

  • Read my post here and see if it will help you to begin to understand the difference in use and meaning of 'to not' and 'not to'.
  • Then ask more questions.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

6 Answers
0
Read my post here and see if it will help you to begin to understand the difference in use and meaning of 'to not' and 'not to'.

Then ask more questions.
0
So, which ones of my sentences are incorrect?

Thanks
0
offroadDear teachers I've had a hard time understanding why 'to not' is preferable here instead of 'not to':
"to not" is the correct grammar to express your meaning in the following two sentences.



How do you get the lions to not eat you? [Y]

How do you get him to not d
0
Well... I must say that I am a bit chocked those sentences are imprecise!

Thank you very much
0
offroadI've had a hard time understanding why 'to not' is preferable here instead of 'not to'
Opinions vary on this 'split infinitive' issue. My personal opinion is this: Never use 'to not'. If you're using 'to not', you're not using the right phrasing for the thought.

How do you get the lions not to eat you?

How do you get him not
0
CalifJimOpinions vary on this 'split infinitive' issue. My personal opinion is this: Never use 'to not'. That's a very strong statement that deserves a strong rebuttal.

I am not the only person who thinks that "to not" is a distinct and useful grammar. After all, someone told offroad that "to not" is preferable over "not to" in those two sen

Related Questions