0
HUBLOT Posted 14 years ago
Grammar

Not have a leg to stand on

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/wall-street-journal/agitating-holders-unlikely-to-get-quieter/story-fnay3vxj-1226239609805
“Their role is to preserve and create value but they also need to make sure their value proposition is understood by stakeholders so they have a leg to stand on if an agitator comes along and their value message is something they should be consistently communicating to the market,” Ms Wiggins said, acknowledging having a running start to defending value would be easier than from a standing start.
------------------------------

Should "have a leg to stand on" be used with such negative word as "not"?

http://www.ldoceonline.com/dictionary/leg_1
not have a leg to stand on
informal
to be in a situation where you cannot prove or legally support what you say:
- If you didn't sign a contract, you won't have a leg to stand on.
  

Top answer

HUBLOT Should "have a leg to stand on" be used with such negative word as "not"? It's perfectly fine and very common.

  • HUBLOT Should "have a leg to stand on" be used with such negative word as "not"?
  • It's perfectly fine and very common.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

2 Answers
0
HUBLOTShould "have a leg to stand on" be used with such negative word as "not"?
It's perfectly fine and very common.
0

Related Questions