Rule: Use commas before and after nonessential words, phrases, and clauses, that is, elements embedded in the sentence that interrupt it without changing the essential meaning.
Would this example need a relative clause (who is blind to his human rights or is this optional. The implied meaning is the same either way is it not ? The rule says 'clauses' but isn't specific.
What about the when the appostive comes next to the nonessential element: is this ok as written.
The officer continues to interrogate the suspect, a spy, blind to his human rights, as it is revealed he's working for the resistance.
The officer continues to interrogate the suspect, a spy , blind to his human rights , as it is revealed he's working for the resistance. Yes, you could use a relative clause here, but it's not essential since the meaning would be the same. The adjective phrase "blind to his human rights" refers to"suspect", just as the relative clause would.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
The officer continues to interrogate the suspect, a spy, blind to his human rights, as it is revealed he's working for the resistance.
Yes, you could use a relative clause here, but it's not essential since the meaning would be the same. The adjective phrase "blind to his human rights" refers to"suspect", just as the relative clause would.
panda blue 483The officer continues to interrogate the suspect, a spy, blind to his human rights, as it is revealed he's working for the resistance.
I take 'blind to his human rights' as restrictive, so I would omit that comma after 'spy'.
CJ