0
Reshary Posted 21 years ago
Grammar

Non-defining relative clause

0 They have two sons who became doctors. 02br
00They have two sons, who became doctors. 02br
02br
00I think these two sentences have a different meaning. The first one means that they might have more than two children. So they have two sons who became a doctor and at the same time they might have one son who became a lawyer. 02br
00However, the second one means that they have only two sons and the sons are doctors. 02br
02br
00Then, how about this sentence? 02br
02br
00My family is four; we have two sons who are students. 02br
02br
00Is "COMMA" obligatory between 'two sons' and 'who'? 02br
02br
00According to the sentence, my family consists of four members. "We" might be mom and papa. Therefore, "We" must have two children, not more than two. 02br
02br
00Please help me!! 02br
0-
  

Top answer

0 Dear Reshary, 02br 02br 00Sentence number two is not possible. It is: «they have two sons, who became doctors». 02br 02br 00Kind regards, 05002br 00Goldmund 010id1

— Goldmund

  • 0 Dear Reshary, 02br 02br 00Sentence number two is not possible.
  • It is: «they have two sons, who became doctors».
  • 02br 02br 00Kind regards, 05002br 00Goldmund 010id1
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

2 Answers
0
0 Dear Reshary, 02br
02br
00Sentence number two is not possible. It is: «they have two sons, who became doctors». 02br
02br
00Kind regards, 05002br
00Goldmund 010id1
0
0
0 They have two sons who became doctors. 02br
02br
00They have two sons, one of whom became a doctor. 02br
02br
00I would not usually put a comma in the first sentence unless "who became doctors" was less important than the subsequent statement. (Sorry, I don't know the correct grammatical term). 02br
02br
00Here's an example: 02br
0

Related Questions