0
Tara2 Posted 6 years ago
Grammar

Nobody who

No one / None who has needed a hospital bed | WordReference Forums

Why can 'nobody' be used in a restrictive clause but not in a non-restrictive clause?

1- Nobody who has needed a hospital bed has been denied a hospital bed.
You can't use "nobody" with a non-restrictive clause either.
2- Nobody, who has needed a hospital bed, has been denied a hospital bed.

  

Top answer

Tara2 Why can 'nobody' be used in a restrictive clause but not in a non-restrictive clause? On its own, 'nobody' doesn't have a referent. There is nothing in the real world you can point to and say, "That's nobody".

  • Tara2 Why can 'nobody' be used in a restrictive clause but not in a non-restrictive clause?
  • On its own, 'nobody' doesn't have a referent.
  • There is nothing in the real world you can point to and say, "That's nobody".
  • It just means no person at all.
  • It's the absence of any person to refer to.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

2 Answers
0
Tara2Why can 'nobody' be used in a restrictive clause but not in a non-restrictive clause?

On its own, 'nobody' doesn't have a referent. There is nothing in the real world you can point to and say, "That's nobody". It just means no person at all. It's the absence of any person to refer to.

You can't make a parenthetical remark (i.e., a non-restrict

0

Of course, grammar can get a little complicated if your name is Nobody. Emotion: big smile

My Name Is Nobody (Italian: Il

Related Questions