0
HUBLOT Posted 11 years ago
Grammar

No immediate indication


No officers were injured in the incident, and no immediate indication what the gang disbute was exactly about.

Is this sentence correct? How about "... and there is no immediate indication of what the gang disbute was exactly about"?
  

Top answer

HUBLOT Is this sentence correct? It is not a full and properly formed sentence. HUBLOT How about "...

— GPY

  • HUBLOT Is this sentence correct?
  • It is not a full and properly formed sentence.
  • HUBLOT How about "...
  • and there is no immediate indication of what the gang disbute was exactly about"?
  • Yes (apart from the typo in "dispute" and the rather casual positioning of "exactly", both of which are carried over from the original).
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

7 Answers
0
HUBLOTIs this sentence correct?
It is not a full and properly formed sentence.
HUBLOTHow about "... and there is no immediate indication of what the gang disbute was exactly about"?
Yes (apart from the typo in "dispute" and the rather casual positioning of "exactly", both of which are carried over from the origin
0
0
Thanks a lot, GPY. Emotion: smile

Where is it better to place the "exactly"?

How about "... and there is no immediate indication
0
0
HUBLOTHow about "... and there is no immediate indication of exactly what the gang dispute was about"?
Right. That is more standard.
0
0
Thank you, GPY.

How about "... and there is no immediate indication of what exactly the gang dispute was about"?
0
0
HUBLOTThank you, GPY.How about "... and there is no immediate indication of what exactly the gang dispute was about"?
That is OK but not quite as natural (for me).
0
0
Thanks a lot, GPY. Emotion: smile
0

Related Questions