0"next of kin" is a noun phrase in this sentence. It means "closest relatives". That is why the verb "have" has been used.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
01cite10Tearsofjoy12cite12br10Hello Tearsofjoy,02br
10 The words "next of" or "kin" have no independent status in the sentence.12br
12br
12blockquote
01cite10Mylakh12cite10If I may, your original sentence is grammatically incorrect. The correct versions : 12br
12br
10(a) The word "next of" or "kin" 11i10has12i10 no independent status in the sentence. 11i10or 12i12br
12br
10(b) The words "next of" and "ki
01cite10Tearsofjoy12cite11blockquote11cite20Mylakh22cite20If I may, your original sentence is grammatically incorrect. The correct versions : 22br
22br
20(a) The word "next of" or "kin" 21i20has22i20 no independent status in the sentence. 21i20
01cite10Mylakh12cite10 If I may, again, your second sentence has also same error:12br10No, Mylakh. "Closest relatives" is a plural. I could not use "ha
12br
10"the closest relatives of the driver or the victim have to be notified of the incident." . Take care.12br
12br
12blockquote
01cite10Tearsofjoy12cite11blockquote11cite20Mylakh22cite20 If I may, again, your second sentence has also same error: 22br
22br
20"the closest relatives of the driver or the victim have to be notified of the incident." . Take care.22br
22br
22blockquote
01cite10Tearsofjoy12cite10Ah. Now I catch the ambiguity which made you think there was a mistake. The sentence should be - "the closest relatives of the driver or 11i10of 12i10the victim have to be notified of the incident." Even without the "of" - wouldn't the victim of an accident know the accident has taken pla