News editors decide what to broadcast on television and what to print in newspapers. What factors do you think influence these decisions? Do we become used to bad news? Would it be better if more good news was reported?

For many years the types of broadcasting and newspaper have being the first and the fastest data distribution to audience via audio and video medium. Doubtless, it was attracted by majority people and by this time it has increased its quantity of viewers.
As long as we are living in developed country we may have a lot of opportunities to watch unacceptable efforts therefore, we are to notice disagreeable news on TV or in newspapers more than the pleasant one. Having wrong aim being in undesirable way is the reason for creating miserable events which is making bad news. Editors are responsible for letting us know about single news which is occurring in the whole world.
Moreover, bad news is news too. By getting information we can undertake for necessary steps, for example, if there was a theft in your street you would be able to be more attentive or if there is any illness or harmful gas the comfortable, helpful and the quickest entity is excepted to be broadcasting.
From my perspective, bad news are more, useful if we enjoy and relax or be glad hearing good news we can keep our preservation more widely by listening to bad one. Nevertheless, distasteful news may show valuable assist to save us from dangerous occurrence, in order world is not composed solely from positivity.
In conclusion, I hope we will be surrounded with more pleasant information in future but I want to stress that according the age requests there is no negative side of reporting bad news.