0
Anonymous Posted 20 years ago
Grammar

need someone to explain some sentences

Can someone explain the below

To think of the chasm of apathy in which we have fallen--a shame, a pitul shame .

I'd second the motion.

They had a riot on their hands

They had a riot at their hands.

He might act hard-boiled now and then, but it is an act that folds under the slightest scare.

I could smash the window when and if I like to do it. What does it mean " when and if " ?

There is liable to cracking cement. What is " there is liable " refering to ?

Nobody is hooting at him any more. Is there any difference " nobody " and " no body " or "anymore " or " any more" ?

We hear the cement grind at our feet. What does it mean " grind " ?

Just limbering up ?

His hands are froze into red claws. What is" red claw " ?

Can I say ? His hands are freezing into red claws ? If it ok, any difference betwee them.

Thanks
  

Top answer

Anonymous Can someone explain the below To think of the chasm of apathy in which we have fallen--a shame, a pitul shame . This is a metaphor. " ("pitul" is not a word - probably pitiful) I'd second the motion.

  • Anonymous Can someone explain the below To think of the chasm of apathy in which we have fallen--a shame, a pitul shame .
  • This is a metaphor.
  • " ("pitul" is not a word - probably pitiful) I'd second the motion.
  • Someone has made a suggestion and you agree with it.
  • In formal meetings, there's something called "Roberts' Rules of Order" - one person makes a motion (suggestion), one other person much second it, and then people vote on it.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

1 Answers
0
AnonymousCan someone explain the below

To think of the chasm of apathy in which we have fallen--a shame, a pitul shame . This is a metaphor. Like "a pit of despair." ("pitul" is not a word - probably pitiful)

I'd second the motion. Someone has made a suggestion and you agree with it. In formal meetings, there's something called "Roberts' Rules of

Related Questions