0
Surfer Posted 13 years ago
Grammar

need help with statement

Hello, everyone.

I came across the following at motortrend.com:

 Long a volume, mainstream brand in Europe, once Chevrolet started to be sold in  Europe, Opel’s positioning and brand mission became unclear.

Source: http://wot.motortrend.com/general-motors-to-move-opel-upmarket-in-europe-384249.html#axzz2YLlvVEgW

1.I can't decide what the meaning of the first comma is, is it:

a.Marking an introductory phrase? Or
b.Is it there to separate volume and brand -two names of equal standing? If so, what's long describing, volume alone, or volume and brand?

3.The Long a volume, mainstream brand in Europe part is an introductory phrase, right?

4.The main clause that's to follow Long a volume, mainstream brand in Europe is:

a.Opel’s positioning and brand mission became unclear? Or,

b.once Chevrolet started to be sold in  Europe, Opel’s positioning and brand mission became unclear?

5.If the answer to 4 is b, then that means the main clause itself can also consist of a main clause preceeded by an introductory, right?

6.If the answer to 4 is a, then that means a main clause can be preceeded by more than one introductory phrase/clause, separated by commas and are of equal standing, right?
  

Top answer

It is a badly written introductory phrase. To me, the writer uses the comma to separate "volume" and "mainstream" - two noun adjuncts. The phrase itself is a misplaced, ambiguous modifier.

  • It is a badly written introductory phrase.
  • To me, the writer uses the comma to separate "volume" and "mainstream" - two noun adjuncts.
  • The phrase itself is a misplaced, ambiguous modifier.
  • The sentence is not worth consideration for analysis, unless you want a good example of poorly written text..
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

1 Answers
0
It is a badly written introductory phrase. To me, the writer uses the comma to separate "volume" and "mainstream" - two noun adjuncts. The phrase itself is a misplaced, ambiguous modifier.
The sentence is not worth consideration for analysis, unless you want a good example of poorly written text..

Related Questions