I'm self-learning how to break down sentences. Came across this sentence in the paper, and I'm stumped.
Any help is greatly appreciated.
"Crammed among the rock, the one-time feudal home of Monaco's Grimaldi royal family has a glorious setting and; for cyclists, an equally glorious descent through the Val d'Enfer (Valley of Hell), a gully that, amid the Alpilles' skull-like boulders, seems appropriately named."
Breakdown:
Crammed among the rock - VP the one-time feudal home of Monaco's Grimaldi royal family has a glorious setting - main clause and - coordinator for cyclists - PP an equally glorious descent - the 2nd main clause through the Val d'Enfer - PP a gully that seems appropriately named - dependent clause? amid the Alpilles' skull-like boulders - PP
Is there anything wrong with the breakdown above?
Thanks!
Top answer
Not really my cup of tea. The semicolon puzzles me greatly. ) I see only one main clause: home has setting and descent .
— Avangi
Not really my cup of tea.
The semicolon puzzles me greatly.
) I see only one main clause: home has setting and descent .
"
Free · every Monday
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
thanks a lot! uh... got fouled up by the "and".. thought it coordinated two clauses. The length of the sentence and all the brackets and semi-colon really make it difficult.
"a gully that.......... seems appropriately named"
That's a relative clause and also a dependent clause right?
Ter: Until the experts answer you, here are a few ideas: (1) Crammed among the rocks = participial clause that modifies "feudal home"; (2) "descent" is the second object of "has" ("setting" being the first object); (3) "gully" is in apposition to "Val d'Enfer." I, too, am eager to see what the experts say.