Need help

Question

"In most cases, the accuracy of reduce method is better compared to direct method especially at finer tolerance. However, Tables 23 and 24 showed that direct method have higher accuracy/ small value of maximum error than reduce method. It was seen for problem 2.3 direct method has less accuracy at step size 0.1 and 0.2. Nonetheless the overall performance in terms of accuracy gained by direct method is still within a prescribed step size."

Do these sentences have grammatical error? Thanks a lot.. I really appreciate your contribution.

Mister Micawber · Accepted Answer

In most cases, the accuracy of the reduction method is greater than that of the direct method, especially at finer tolerance. However, Tables 23 and 24 show that the direct method has a smaller value of maximum error than the recuction method. It was seen that in problem 2.3 the direct method is less accurate at step size 0.1 and 0.2. Nonetheless the overall performance in terms of accuracy gained by the direct method is still within a prescribed step size.

Myvi · Answer

Thanks once again...

Sir, if you have time I need your help to check the grammar of these sentences..Thanks a lot..I really appreciate it..

From analysis the Tables 23-30 focusing on the total steps taken by these two methods, it can be observed that direct method have less total number of steps compared to reduction method. This advantage is clearly seen at finer step size.

The execution time taken by these two methods is one of the important elements to be analyzed and it seems that the performance of this feature is parallel to/dependent on the total number of steps taken and total function evaluation. Since the direct method has less total number of function to be evaluated rather than reduction method, thus direct method can performs faster compare to reduction method significantly at smaller step size. Following from this, it can be said that the reduction method is more expensive to be used compared to direct method.

Mister Micawber · Answer

Analysis of Tables 23-30 shows that the direct method requires fewer steps than the reduction method. This advantage is more clearly seen at finer step size. Execution time is an important element, and it is evidently correlated with the total number of steps required and total function evaluation. Since the direct method has fewer functions to be evaluated, it can be performed significantly faster than the reduction method at smaller step size. Therefore, the reduction method is a more expensive procedure.

Need help

Top answer

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

Related Questions