"Times the number by a thousand." Is this construction: (1) Rural/regional? (2) Childish/illiterate? (3) Jargonistic? (4) Pondially differentiated? It came up in a document here at work yesterday and I want to know if I'm out of line to demand it be reworded..r
Top answer
" Is this construction: (1) Rural/regional? (2) Childish/illiterate? (3) Jargonistic?
— Usenet
" Is this construction: (1) Rural/regional?
(2) Childish/illiterate?
(3) Jargonistic?
(4) Pondially differentiated?
r[/nq] Number 2.
Free · every Monday
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
[nq:1]"Times the number by a thousand." Is this construction: (1) Rural/regional? (2) Childish/illiterate? (3) Jargonistic? (4) Pondially differentiated? It came up in a document here at work yesterday and I want to know if I'm out of line to demand it be reworded..r[/nq] Number 2. (Deffo.)
[nq:2]"Times the number by a thousand." Is this construction: (1) ... if I'm out of line to demand it be reworded..r[/nq] [nq:1]Number 2. (Deffo.)[/nq] Yeppo.
[nq:1]"Times the number by a thousand." Is this construction: (1) Rural/regional? (2) Childish/illiterate? (3) Jargonistic? (4) Pondially differentiated? It came up in a document here at work yesterday and I want to know if I'm out of line to demand it be reworded..r[/nq] I'll vote for 2, with the "childish" suboption.
[nq:1]"Times the number by a thousand." Is this construction: (1) Rural/regional? (2) Childish/illiterate? (3) Jargonistic? (4) Pondially differentiated? It came up in a document here at work yesterday and I want to know if I'mout of line to demand it be reworded..r[/nq] It's normal, everyday usage, in the UK at least. It's probably not formal enough for your document though, so just change "t
[nq:2]out of It's normal, everyday usage, in the UK at least.[/nq] [nq:1]*Is* it? Not in my experience. Not since my children were very young.[/nq] Depends who you mix with, I suppose. I know I'm much more likely to say "times it by five" than "multiply it by five". "Multiply" is jargon. It's like saying "subtract" instead of "take away". Adrian
[nq:1]"Multiply" is jargon. It's like saying "subtract" instead of "take away".[/nq] No it isn't. Do tell us why the everyday word "multiply" is jargon.
R.H. Draney: [nq:1]"Times the number by a thousand." Is this construction: (1) Rural/regional? (2) Childish/illiterate? (3) Jargonistic? (4) Pondially differentiated?[/nq] I'd say either 2 or, on the grounds that you can verb anything and in jargon formation you frequently do, 3. Obviously, Adrian Bailey's experience is different.
Mark Brader, Toronto "As always, breakfast recapit