0
Usenet Posted 22 years ago
Usage

Need evaluation of a usage point

"Times the number by a thousand."
Is this construction:
(1) Rural/regional?
(2) Childish/illiterate?
(3) Jargonistic?
(4) Pondially differentiated?
It came up in a document here at work yesterday and I want to know if I'm out of line to demand it be reworded..r
  

Top answer

" Is this construction: (1) Rural/regional? (2) Childish/illiterate? (3) Jargonistic?

  • " Is this construction: (1) Rural/regional?
  • (2) Childish/illiterate?
  • (3) Jargonistic?
  • (4) Pondially differentiated?
  • r[/nq] Number 2.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

279 Answers
0
[nq:1]"Times the number by a thousand." Is this construction: (1) Rural/regional? (2) Childish/illiterate? (3) Jargonistic? (4) Pondially differentiated? It came up in a document here at work yesterday and I want to know if I'm out of line to demand it be reworded..r[/nq]
Number 2. (Deffo.)

Laura
(emulate St. George for email)
0
[nq:2]"Times the number by a thousand." Is this construction: (1) ... if I'm out of line to demand it be reworded..r[/nq]
[nq:1]Number 2. (Deffo.)[/nq]
Yeppo.

Mike Nitabach
0
[nq:1]"Times the number by a thousand." Is this construction: (1) Rural/regional? (2) Childish/illiterate? (3) Jargonistic? (4) Pondially differentiated? It came up in a document here at work yesterday and I want to know if I'm out of line to demand it be reworded..r[/nq]
I'll vote for 2, with the "childish" suboption.

rzed
And let us not forget gazintas.
0
[nq:1]"Times the number by a thousand." Is this construction: (1) Rural/regional? (2) Childish/illiterate? (3) Jargonistic? (4) Pondially differentiated? It came up in a document here at work yesterday and I want to know if I'mout of line to demand it be reworded..r[/nq]
It's normal, everyday usage, in the UK at least. It's probably not formal enough for your document though, so just change "t
0
*Is* it? Not in my experience. Not since my children were very young.

Laura
(emulate St. George for email)
0
[nq:1]It's normal, everyday usage, in the UK at least.[/nq]
Only amongst the illiterate.
R.
0
[nq:2]out of It's normal, everyday usage, in the UK at least.[/nq]
[nq:1]*Is* it? Not in my experience. Not since my children were very young.[/nq]
Depends who you mix with, I suppose. I know I'm much more likely to say "times it by five" than "multiply it by five". "Multiply" is jargon. It's like saying "subtract" instead of "take away".
Adrian
0
[nq:1]"Multiply" is jargon. It's like saying "subtract" instead of "take away".[/nq]
No it isn't. Do tell us why the everyday word "multiply" is jargon.

This smacks of reverse snobbery gone mad.
R.
0
[nq:2]It's normal, everyday usage, in the UK at least.[/nq]
[nq:1]Only amongst the illiterate.[/nq]
Objection your honor...
Also among
0
R.H. Draney:
[nq:1]"Times the number by a thousand." Is this construction: (1) Rural/regional? (2) Childish/illiterate? (3) Jargonistic? (4) Pondially differentiated?[/nq]
I'd say either 2 or, on the grounds that you can verb anything and in jargon formation you frequently do, 3. Obviously, Adrian Bailey's experience is different.

Mark Brader, Toronto "As always, breakfast recapit

Related Questions