0
PreciousJones Posted 14 years ago
Grammar

NBA game

The game took a place a few hours ago. Can I say this:

Sorry guys, but if you've watched the game, you know Kobe Bryant single handedly lost the game for the Lakers.

Or should it be:

Sorry guys, but if you watched the game, you know Kobe Bryant single handedly lost the game for the Lakers.
  

Top answer

I see no reason to use Present Perfect here. Why do you think this is possible? m.

  • I see no reason to use Present Perfect here.
  • Why do you think this is possible?
  • m.
  • )
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

8 Answers
0
I see no reason to use Present Perfect here. Why do you think this is possible?
(For discussion of the latter, let's say the game ended at 4 p.m. and it is now 9 p.m.)
0
PreciousJonesThe game took a place a few hours ago. Can I say this:
PreciousJonesSorry guys, but if you watched the game, you know Kobe Bryant single handedly lost the game for the Lakers.
This is a counter-factual (conditional) context. I would say: If you watched the gam
0
The sentence in Past Tense and Present Tense is exactly the way this would be asserted as FACT by the speaker. I very much doubt a sports fan would hedge with conditional statements!
0
But what if the fact was, I didn't watch the game. Wouldn't that be counter-factual? When I ran into you, I asked " Did the Lakers win?" And you replied" if you watched the game, you should / would see how Kobie single-handledly lost the game for the Lakers.
0
The sentence, as it's written, is more of a logical deduction than a true, conditional sentence.

If you watched the game (and I know you did), you know that Kobe single-handledly lost the game for the Lakers.

You can even substitute "since" for "if", and the meaning will remain the same.

Since you watched the game, you know that Kobe single-handledly lost the game for
0
HiIvanh,
IvanhrSince you watched the game, you know that Kobe single-handledly lost the game for the Lakers.
No problem there, grammatically and syntactically speaking, it is workable, and it would certainly remove the "conditionality" element from the statement. However, the intrinsic meaning of "since" and "if" don't are not the same. By replace "if" with " si
0
dimsumexpressthe intrinsic meaning of "since" and "if" don't are not the same. By replace "if" with " since", we in fact would shift the meaning of the sentence, from my viewpoint
Yes, they are different. Still, I think that "if" can be interpreted as since because it's not unusal in casual conversation to use "if" (and not since or some other word) even when
0
IvanhrWell, if/since you saw it then you know that Kobe sigle-handedly lost the game for the Lakers. (the meaning of "if" here can be interpreted as since)
Ivanhr,
Sorry! I hate to disagree. I just don't see how you can interpret "if" as "since" in the NBA context. Since I've already made several sentence examples, so I

Related Questions