I see no reason to use Present Perfect here. Why do you think this is possible? m.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
PreciousJonesThe game took a place a few hours ago. Can I say this:
PreciousJonesSorry guys, but if you watched the game, you know Kobe Bryant single handedly lost the game for the Lakers.This is a counter-factual (conditional) context. I would say: If you watched the gam
IvanhrSince you watched the game, you know that Kobe single-handledly lost the game for the Lakers.No problem there, grammatically and syntactically speaking, it is workable, and it would certainly remove the "conditionality" element from the statement. However, the intrinsic meaning of "since" and "if" don't are not the same. By replace "if" with " si
dimsumexpressthe intrinsic meaning of "since" and "if" don't are not the same. By replace "if" with " since", we in fact would shift the meaning of the sentence, from my viewpointYes, they are different. Still, I think that "if" can be interpreted as since because it's not unusal in casual conversation to use "if" (and not since or some other word) even when
IvanhrWell, if/since you saw it then you know that Kobe sigle-handedly lost the game for the Lakers. (the meaning of "if" here can be interpreted as since)Ivanhr,