National English Contest writing - Good health

Good health is a basic human right. However, in a growing number of countries today, access to health care depends on socio-economic status. This is discriminatory and should not be the basis for access to good health.

To what extent do you agree with the statement? Write an essay of about 350 words to express your opinion. Give reasons and specific examples to support your answer.

Answer:

There is currently a backlog of countries where health services are distributed on account of citizens’ social and financial status. This interdependence is deemed to provoke a sense of differentiation among people and not to be the basis for the accessibility of health care. Personally, I am completely in favor of this stance.

To begin with, health care provision based on inhabitants’ wherewithal and social status is unfair. Every human being requires well-being to maintain their existence and perform vital actions. An example is that in Africa, more than 200 impoverished children are being killed every single day due to such common ailments as flu or fever, whereas children in wealthy nations rarely experience a deficiency in cures. Such instances are the outcome of the insufficient quantity of vaccines delivered in poor countries. This injustice should not transpire only due to the fact that these poor nations are lack of finance, and should be abolished with the global help of philanthropists.

In addition, I strongly believe the dependence of health acquirement should not be solely fixed on the patient’s economic and social profile. Firstly, the severity of the person’s indisposition should be the ultimate factor to be assessed and given care. For instance, a poor employee with the concluding stage of tuberculosis should be given treatment for the time being rather than denuded of it until he dies. Secondly, the patient’s contribution to the community is also a factor to be regarded. To illustrate this, a hospital had better assist an impoverished worker who helped build splendid constructions and houses in treatment of his aching back with cost alleviation. It would be implausible to charge him the same as a rich spendthrift incessantly frittering his parent’s budget on motor-racing, binges with no work whatsoever. That is certainly a ludicrous and unjustifiable malpractice of any hospital in existence.

All in all, I would argue that no societal and incremental background ought to be regarded when allocating health care services, as every individual has the right to obtain superb and adequate treatment conditions. The citizen’s state of health degradation and social helpfulness should be taken into account rather than their financial status.

(360 words)

Thank you for reading and correcting me. I really appreciate it.