0
Terr3 Posted 19 years ago
Grammar

Name's/Name

Hi!
His painting is similar to Van Gough

Can anyone explain to me why wasn't this thrase go like this:
'His painting is similar to Van Gough's.'

To me, 'His painting is similar to Van Gough' is more like this person's painting looks like Van Gough himself, the appearance of Van Gough. But that doesn't make sense.
'His painting is similar to Van Gough's.' is more likely meaning this person's painting looks like Van Gough's painting.

I have met across several times people would take it as a mistake by using 's. Like this one:

"Hati's theory" is one of the most profound invention by Hati.

Someone came to me and rewrite it as just the 'Hati theory'. I took it as it was a mistake.

Was I wrong?

Thank you in advance. -Terr3
  

Top answer

Terr3 Hi! ' To me, 'His painting is similar to Van Gough' is more like this person's painting looks like Van Gough himself, the appearance of Van Gough. But that doesn't make sense.

  • Terr3 Hi!
  • ' To me, 'His painting is similar to Van Gough' is more like this person's painting looks like Van Gough himself, the appearance of Van Gough.
  • But that doesn't make sense.
  • ' is more likely meaning this person's painting looks like Van Gough's painting.
  • I have met across several times people would take it as a mistake by using 's.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

2 Answers
0
Terr3Hi! His painting is similar to Van Gough Can anyone explain to me why wasn't this thrase go like this: 'His painting is similar to Van Gough's.' To me, 'His painting is similar to Van Gough' is more like this person's painting looks like Van Gough himself, the appearance of Van Gough. But that doesn't make sense. 'His painting is similar to Van Gough's.' is more like
0

Related Questions