0
Anonymous Posted 11 years ago
Grammar

Must/have to

I've read in a book that:
"have to" is used for rules and obligations or to say something is necessary.
"must" for rules, obligations.

There is an exercises in which we "have to" and "must"

I) Make true sentences about the rules in your school. Use "have to", "don't have to" and "mustn't

1. You have to come to lessons on time.
2. You must turn off the mobile phone.
3. You mustn't eat or drink in the classroom.
4. You don't have to come to class on Saturday.
5. You have to bring a dictionary to class.
6. You have to do an exam at the end of the year.
7. You mustn't smoke in the building.
8. You have to do homework after each lesson.
9. You have to do a test every day.

Can you check it, I am not sure about 6 and 9.

There is another exercise on this topic:
II) Complete the sentences with "have to", "don't have to" and "mustn't

1.You don't have to touch those animals.They are dangerous.
2. You mustn't leave the door open-the cats will come in.
3. In Britain you must drive on the left.

I'm not sure about all of them.

Thank You!
  

Top answer

"must" for rules, obligations. The usual differentiation is that 'must' refers to an inward compulsion, while 'have to' refers to a command from an authority outside oneself. Most native speakers, however, are unaware of this guideline, and many are liable to use either, with 'have to' dominating because the past tense of 'must' is 'had to', while the past of 'have to' (meaning necessity) is 'mustn't'.

  • "must" for rules, obligations.
  • The usual differentiation is that 'must' refers to an inward compulsion, while 'have to' refers to a command from an authority outside oneself.
  • Most native speakers, however, are unaware of this guideline, and many are liable to use either, with 'have to' dominating because the past tense of 'must' is 'had to', while the past of 'have to' (meaning necessity) is 'mustn't'.
  • According to those guidelines, I would expect these corrections to your sentences: 2.
  • You have to turn off the mobile phone.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

5 Answers
0
AnonymousI've read in a book that: "have to" is used for rules and obligations or to say something is necessary."must" for rules, obligations.
The usual differentiation is that 'must' refers to an inward compulsion, while 'have to' refers to a command from an authority outside oneself. Most native speakers, however, are unaware of this guideline, and many are
0
Mister MicawberThe usual differentiation is that 'must' refers to an inward compulsion, while 'have to' refers to a command from an authority outside oneself.
Whereas signage in the U.S. works just the reverse:

RIGHT LANE MUST EXIT (Traffic authority)

CJ
0
CalifJimWhereas signage in the U.S. works just the reverse:RIGHT LANE MUST EXIT (Traffic authority)
Ah, yes. The difference in meaning is often used to psychologically shift responsibility.
0
Mister MicawberThe difference in meaning is often used to psychologically shift responsibility.
I'll take your word for it. I've never understood this inner and outer thing anyway with have to and must, let alone using them to shift responsibility.
0
CalifJim using them to shift responsibility
Just my perception, CJ. I've always thought that 'right lane must', etc., subtly makes the driver consider himself responsible for the decision instead of just obeying a command from the department of transportation. Some gummint sign designer 'way back when noticed that signage could do that.

Related Questions