0
Top answer
Hi, I believe that there isn't a past form of must , and had to isn't its past form. But we can use had to to express our ideas of the obligations which were set in the past if we want to . And for Future Tense, we need to use the alternative - will have to ( not will must ).
- Hi, I believe that there isn't a past form of must , and had to isn't its past form.
- But we can use had to to express our ideas of the obligations which were set in the past if we want to .
- And for Future Tense, we need to use the alternative - will have to ( not will must ).
- Must is also used for logical conclusions, when something happened in the past.
- Ex: That must have been Tom who opened the door.
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
1 Answers
0
Hi,
I believe that there isn't a past form of must, and had to isn't its past form. But we can use had to to express our ideas of the obligations which were set in the past if we want to. And for
I believe that there isn't a past form of must, and had to isn't its past form. But we can use had to to express our ideas of the obligations which were set in the past if we want to. And for
0
Related Questions