#2 is not natural. Clive
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
Clive if we know something a bit, we usually think we know it, and do not realize the degree to which we don't know it.But this is quite natural, isn't it? Why do you think this one is OK whereas the example already given is not?
TakaBut this is quite natural, isn't it? Why do you think this one is OK whereas the example already given is not?I don't know much about it.'It' refers to a larger topic such as 'sky-diving' or 'hedge funds'. The original refers simply to a word, which we either know or do not know.
Mister Micawber.'It' refers to a larger topic such as 'sky-diving' or 'hedge funds'. The original refers simply to a word, which we either know or do not know.OK. Then why is this one fine?
Taka Then why is this one fine?I don't think it's fine at all. Did I say so earlier?
TakaAre you saying that whether it's "much" or "well", as for the meaning of a word, we either know it or we don't and there is nothing in between, so neither "much" nor "well" works?Yes, that is what I think—or at least, that is why they sound strange.