I know that 'motor' can be considered an adjective in certain cases (certainly in British English) but in a phrase such as 'motor boat', where the words are almost accepted as a compound word, am I right in thinking that 'motor' is also to be considered a noun?
Top answer
Don't worry about this, I'm pretty confident that it is only really being used as an attributive noun here.
— David Hatton
Don't worry about this, I'm pretty confident that it is only really being used as an attributive noun here.
Free · every Monday
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
It's a boat with a motor (noun)., 'Motor' cannot be modified by 'very' and has no comparative or superlative forms. So it's a noun. However, does that matter? Its function is to modify another noun. As David wrote, don't worry about it (unless you have one of those teachers who thinks there is some point in labelling parts of speech).
(later) I have just checked what some of the dictiona
Sadly, I have to edit a book on grammar for children and am finding that the original text is riddled with potential errors. I'm also trying to determine whether 'animal' in 'we were looking at animal images that had been painted...' is an adjective as it's presented as being such, and I know it exists as an adjective. Does it act as one here, though? My instinct is no, it's an attributive noun
I agree with you, but you' need to discuss terminology with the author and publisher. I don't think it's up to a proofreader to change the terminology of one school of grammar to that of another.
The publisher has thrown it back to me, having made errors in their previous text that I picked up, and the author isn't a professional lexicographer... To me, 'animal' in its adjectival form refers to something physical (e.g. animal instincts) or something deriving from an animal source. An 'animal image' on a painting seems to refer to an image of an animal, as opposed to an image that is