I have written a draft for a motivation letter, which i'll include in a Ph.D. application. Because, at the moment, I don't have acces to someone from whom I can get feed back, I'll post it here, and hopefuly someone will be able to read it and comment. Thank you in advance to whom might read it. To whom it may concern,
Application for the XXX Ph.D. Program
The present letter will explain the reasons why I'm applying to a Ph.D. degree.
By enrolling on the undergraduate course on Systems and Informatics Engineering at the XXX University, I came in contact with different paradigms, technics and methodologies for software development.
In the early years of my studies at the university I was a student of Professor XXX which introduced me to the basis of Formal Methods for software development and verification.
Soon I discovered the interest for Formal Methods, and got involved in the Grand Challenge in Computer Science initiative. This experience gave me a taste of what research in Formal Methods is.
Before terminating the under-graduation I entered another challenge like project, forming a team of students like my self for the XXX contest, under the category of Software Design. We made it through to the XXX finals with a project for a distributed environment where mobile devices could be used to increment the contents already available on social data sources like Wikipedia, and others.
Enrolling in the MSc on Informatics at XXX was a natural choice in order to keep working with, and in, Formal Methods, allowing me to continue the research in the context of the Grand Challenge. My thesis subject is XXX, which includes building formal models of a informal specification and it's correction verification.
Under Professor XXX's supervision I have done research on the possibility to use different tools for different aspects of the formal development and verification of software. Which lead to a paper submitted and, presented by me, on the XXX Workshop at the XXX symposium.
The contact with researchers from all over the world made me want to keep doing research on Formal Methods, and push the Grand Challenge initiative further with my contribution.
In 2007 I was invited to join a development team, as a junior developer, to design and build an information system for the "Xxx Xxx Xxx" (XXX). From November/2007 to May/2008 I worked at the XXX facilities together with domain experts to design and build the software system, while maintaining the research related with my MSc studies at the university.
I believe that through Formal Methods one can achieve true engineering concepts for software correction by construction, and that, due to the overwhelming expansion of software applications, not only critical systems should be proven safe and correct.
Nowadays software is embedded in almost every system we use, and in most cases, the producers os these artifacts not only don't provide warranty, but will relieve themselves from any obligation with disclaimer notices.
Formalizing software development, as other engineering driven development communities have done in the past, will give it scientific grounds to hold on, and probably increase its quality. Kind Regards, XXX
Top answer
Comments:- 1) Professor *** which introduced – here I think you’ll find in the name of the Professor, so which should be who . 2) Before terminating the under-graduation I entered another challenge like project, shouldn’t they be Before termination of my undergraduate studies, I entered another challenge like a project, or Before termination of my undergraduate studies, I entered another challenging project, or Before termination of my undergraduate studies, I entered another challenge for a like project, 3) where mobile devices could be used to increment the contents – shouldn’t it be increase 4) a informal specification shouldn’t it be an 5) it's correction verification shouldn’t it be its 6) possibility to use different tools shouldn’t they be of using 7) verification of software. Which lead to a paper submitted and, presented by me, on shouldn’t they be verification of software leading to a paper being submitted and, presented by me, on 8) and that, due to the overwhelming expansion of software applications, not only critical systems should be proven safe and correct shouldn’t they be and that, owing to the overwhelming expansion of software applications, critical systems should additionally be proven safe and correct 9) the producers os these artifacts shouldn’t it be of
— 26TMNTJG2PG
Comments:- 1) Professor *** which introduced – here I think you’ll find in the name of the Professor, so which should be who .
2) Before terminating the under-graduation I entered another challenge like project, shouldn’t they be Before termination of my undergraduate studies, I entered another challenge like a project, or Before termination of my undergraduate studies, I entered another challenging project, or Before termination of my undergraduate studies, I entered another challenge for a like project, 3) where mobile devices could be used to increment the contents – shouldn’t it be increase 4) a informal specification shouldn’t it be an 5) it's correction verification shouldn’t it be its 6) possibility to use different tools shouldn’t they be of using 7) verification of software.
Which lead to a paper submitted and, presented by me, on shouldn’t they be verification of software leading to a paper being submitted and, presented by me, on 8) and that, due to the overwhelming expansion of software applications, not only critical systems should be proven safe and correct shouldn’t they be and that, owing to the overwhelming expansion of software applications, critical systems should additionally be proven safe and correct 9) the producers os these artifacts shouldn’t it be of
Free · every Monday
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.