On Mar 8, 5:12=A0am, "Opinicus" [nq:1]If someone says "Exports in December 2008 were down 39.4% on a month-on-month basis", what are December 2008 exports being compared with=? Bobhttp://www.kanyak.com[/nq] December, 2007 GFH
[nq:2]If someone says "Exports in December 2008 were down 39.4% on a month-on-month basis", what are December 2008 exports being compared with? Bobhttp://www.kanyak.com[/nq] [nq:1]December, 2007 GFH[/nq] Yes. They've just started using this phrase in the news lately, and I think they should have explained it for a several
[nq:2]If someone says "Exports in December 2008 were down 39.4% on a month-on-month basis", what are December 2008 exports being compared with? Bobhttp://www.kanyak.com[/nq] [nq:1]December, 2007[/nq] By analogy with "year-on-year" the sentence should mean that the comparison was with exports in November 2008, but it
[nq:2]December, 2007[/nq] [nq:1]By analogy with "year-on-year" the sentence should mean that the comparison was with exports in November 2008, but it doesn't. ... referred to as Month-to-month (Period-to-period) changes, or Month-over-month changes. The OECD uses "month-on-month" in its reports without defining the term.[/nq] Dang. So I didn't know either. That's why I said the news
[nq:2]December, 2007[/nq] [nq:1]By analogy with "year-on-year" the sentence should mean that the comparison was with exports in November 2008, but it doesn't. ... referred to as Month-to-month (Period-to-period) changes, or Month-over-month changes. The OECD uses "month-on-month" in its reports without defining the term.[/nq] From the above I would take "month-on-month" to be an ell