0
Anonymous Posted 9 years ago
Linguistics Studies
Monotransitive?
Is we roasted marshmallows for the children monotransitive?
Top answer
Yes, it is monotransitive because it has only one object, "marshmallows". The preposition phrase "for the children" is not an indirect object, though it is a complement of the verb "roast".
- Yes, it is monotransitive because it has only one object, "marshmallows".
- The preposition phrase "for the children" is not an indirect object, though it is a complement of the verb "roast".
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
1 Answers
0
Yes, it is monotransitive because it has only one object, "marshmallows". The preposition phrase "for the children" is not an indirect object, though it is a complement of the verb "roast".
0
Related Questions