Do you have any more context? " Some rough idea of the kind of context you are asking about would be useful.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
Nelly BoichencoThis is a model for the Eiffel Tower.~ This is a model we will use to show people how the Eiffel Tower will look when it is built.
Nelly BoichencoThis is a model of the Eiffel Tower.~ This is
Nelly BoichencoThank you.Here is my sentence: It provides a simple model of the situation known as "stopped light".Why I can't use " for " instead of "of" ?I don't exactly understand what you are referring to, but in cases like yours seems to be, "A is a model of B" means that A is a representation of B, while "A is a model for B" means that B is based on A.
Nelly Boichenco... provides a simple model of the situation known as ...In my opinion, you can use "of" in that context. Or "for". I really don't think anybody is going to pause on that sentence thinking that something is wrong with it, no matter which of the two you use.
... why I can't use "of " in my sentence ...
CalifJimShe works as a model of the agency.You can have a model of the agency, but that would be a small version of the agency. People are not small versions of buildings, so this doesn't seem to make any sense.People are not small versions of buildings, but they could be small versions of other people.(Am I right?)
Nelly Boichenco[The contextWe obtained a solution of physical problem. As a result we get a set of formulas. Ours formulas are cool: they looks like anothether formulas that are describing an effect known as "stopped light". It means that our result could model (simulate/ imitate) an effect known as "stopped light". ]At the risk of labouring this, in your sen
Nelly BoichencoCan I write the sentence below? Jim is a model of his father. (I want to say "Jim is like his father".)No. Sorry.