Modal "should" in conditional sentences

.

Hi. Would you say these are correct?-- No. #1 needs future forms:

1-- If you give me some money, I shall/will be happy.

2-- If you gave me some money, I should/would be happy.
Note that the use of 'shall/should' for futurity is disappearing from contemporary English.
Would you say no. 2 represents a more hyphothetical

in my opinoin, the first sentence is right.

.
Moli, I think you would be better to ask questions on our forums and not try to answer them until your English level is higher.
.

I feel depressed at what you said.
I have been learning english hard these years.
I always think this is a good platform to show everyone's view to some question,maybe I am wrong.

.
This is not a place to become emotional, and it is not a place to express 'views' except on the more contentious points of English linguistics; it is a place for learners to get help that they can feel confident in.

Our threads are open to anyone who can assist learners if s/he understands what is needed, but in the past couple of hours I have had to return to several threads just

ok,I accept your suggestion.

Thank you. I think, if I am not mistaken, I have seen a sentence that had the modal "should" in the main clause and a present tense in the if-clause. So what you are saying is all these are not correct?

If you have a flu, you should go see a doctor.

If you are sleepy, you should have a short break.

If you aren't happy, I think you should try to cheer you

.
So what you are saying is all these are not correct?-- No, those 'should' are not the past of 'shall'; they carry a different meaning.

Also, is it correct to use the verb form "did" to express the hypothetical nature, I think, the second conditional sentences show? -- Yes, the past form of the verb expresses present hypothetical.
.