0
Anonymous Posted 10 years ago
Grammar

Mixed conditional

Can you please tell me the differences between these sentences?
1- If only I didn't have so much homework, I could read this book.
2- If only I didn't have so much homework , I could have read this book.
  

Top answer

I find nothing wrong with #1. Others might find #2 okay, but I would say: If only I hadn't had so much homework, I could have read this book.

  • I find nothing wrong with #1.
  • Others might find #2 okay, but I would say: If only I hadn't had so much homework, I could have read this book.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

25 Answers
0
I find nothing wrong with #1. Others might find #2 okay, but I would say: If only I hadn't had so much homework, I could have read this book.
0
1- If only I didn't have so much homework [now/future], I could read this book [now/future].
2- If only I didn't have so much homework [now/future], I could have read this book [past].

As Philip said, #2 one isn't very good. It's hard to see
0
XerxesIf she were more beautiful now, she could have married some millionaire in the past.
I should have elaborated. By "now" I mean that "she" is still around and is still not beautiful enough to marry a millionaire.

If you didn't smoke, they would have offered you an insurance policy with lower premiums.

You are still a smoker now, b
0
XerxesXerxesIf she were more beautiful now, she could have married some millionaire in the past.I should have elaborated. By "now" I mean that "she" is still around and is still not beautiful enough to marry a millionaire.
I'm not saying you're wrong, but I'm a little dubious. It seems as if the millionaire was basing his (hypothetical) decision on how she wo
0
CalifJimI'm not saying you're wrong, but I'm a little dubious. It seems as if the millionaire was basing his (hypothetical) decision on how she would look in the future. In short, I find this type of mixed conditional confusing. It makes a situation in the past dependent on a situation in the present, doesn't it? That seems backwards to me.
Perhaps the example
0
XerxesHere is another, better example:If you hadn't slept with that ex-boyfriend of yours, you wouldn't be pregnant now.The sleeping part took place in the past; the pregnancy is now.
The reason that it's better is that it's a mixed conditional of a different type. Here what happened in the past influenced the present state of affairs. So this isn't the pres
0
CalifJimHere, as you know from previous discussions, I'd be inclined to think of "If she were" as a substitute for "If she had been there".
I remember our previous discussions, CJ. I struggle to think of "If she were" as a substitute for "if she had been there".

If he were alive, none of this would have happened.
If he were alive [today/now
0
XerxesThat's my take.
Mine too, for the standard version.

CJ
0
If he were alive now, then he would clearly have been alive at the time the things happened.
0
fivejedjonIf he were alive now, then he would clearly have been alive at the time the things happened.
Right, and you have just provided a good example of the mixed conditional!

Related Questions