0
Musicgold Posted 16 years ago
Grammar

Might not otherwise have had

Hi,



The following sentence is from a report. I feel the underlined part is too complicated. Is there a better way of writing it?



It provides a source of financing to firms that might not otherwise have had access to markets.





Thanks,



MG.
  

Top answer

You'd have to give up certain aspects of the statement, but they're probably present in prior context anyway. to firms that require it. to firms that have been shut out.

  • You'd have to give up certain aspects of the statement, but they're probably present in prior context anyway.
  • to firms that require it.
  • to firms that have been shut out.
  • to firms otherwise denied access to markets.
  • )
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

6 Answers
0
You'd have to give up certain aspects of the statement, but they're probably present in prior context anyway.

to firms that require it.

to firms that have been shut out.

to firms otherwise denied access to markets.

(The modal and the past perfect of course have something to say.)
0
MusicgoldI feel the underlined part is too complicated.
I don't agree. I would leave it as is.

CJ
0
Thanks folks.
CalifJim I don't agree. I would leave it as is.


How about this?


firms that otherwise not have had access...
0
Musicgold firms that otherwise not have had access...
. . . firms that otherwise have not had access. . .

I doubt this changes the advice.
0
MusicgoldHow about this?

firms that otherwise not have had access...
No. That's worse. The not is in the wrong place (See Avangi's correction), and the meaning changes from "maybe" to "definitely".

The combination "might not otherwise have [Past participle]" is very good, in my o

Related Questions