0
Tamguatlay Posted 12 years ago
Grammar

Met vs had met

I gave Cameron a chance although he was abusive towards me. We had met in 2005 through a friend.

Should it be "met" instead of "had met" since there is a time element in the sentence?

Thanks.
  

Top answer

tamguatlay Should it be "met" instead of "had met" With the context given, yes. tamguatlay since there is a time element in the sentence? No, that is irrelevant.

— Mister Micawber

  • tamguatlay Should it be "met" instead of "had met" With the context given, yes.
  • tamguatlay since there is a time element in the sentence?
  • No, that is irrelevant.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

1 Answers
0
tamguatlayShould it be "met" instead of "had met"
With the context given, yes.
tamguatlaysince there is a time element in the sentence?
No, that is irrelevant.
0

Related Questions