0
Anonymous Posted 5 years ago
Grammar
Met or was met
Hello,
The king's action was met with resistance from the locals.
The king's action met with resistance from the locals.
Are both fine, or is there a difference?
Thanks
Top answer
Those are both possible and they mean the same thing. For me, "met with" seems neater than "was met with" in this case.
- Those are both possible and they mean the same thing.
- For me, "met with" seems neater than "was met with" in this case.
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
1 Answers
0
Those are both possible and they mean the same thing. For me, "met with" seems neater than "was met with" in this case.
0
Related Questions