0
Tinanam0102 Posted 14 years ago
Grammar

meaning of the sentence

Hi teachers,

From dictionary:

Even so, our acquaintance might have been no more than a hand-grip and a word—he was a laconic old fellow—had it not been for the drinking.

Can you please help break it down for me?
  

Top answer

First, which parts do you understand and which parts do you not, tinanam?

  • First, which parts do you understand and which parts do you not, tinanam?
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

6 Answers
0
First, which parts do you understand and which parts do you not, tinanam?
0
Hi Mister Micawber,

I understand this is a conditional sentence in the past. 'Might have been' and 'had it not been for the drinking' show that. I have read it a few days but still I don't understand the meaning: Did they shake hands, have a word, did the acquaintance drink?

Thanks
Tinanam
0
Even so, our acquaintance might have been no more than a hand-grip and a word—he was a laconic old fellow—had it not been for the drinking.

Did they shake hands, have a word, did the acquaintance drink?-- We do not know whether they actually shook hands and had a word, but we do know that they did more: they formed an acquaintance because of the drinking. Whose drinking is
0
Even so, our acquaintance might have been no more than a hand-grip and a word—he was a laconic old fellow—had it not been for the drinking.

Hi Mister Micawber,

Earlier I misunderstood the meaning of 'acquaintance'.
Can I ask if the following is same as the above meaning?

Our acquaintance might not have been more than a hand-grip and a word had it not b
0
That's right. Acquaintance = acquaintanceship.
0
Hi Mister Micawber,

Thank you.

TN

Related Questions