Can you help me get the gist of the highlighted part, please?
- I have also problem understanding the meaning of some of the words in THIS TEXT, such as : necessity schematic and generalized.
Daniel Harris, a scholar of consumption and style, has observed that until photography finally supplanted illustration as the "primary means of advertising clothing" in the 1950s, glamour inhered less in the face of the drawing, which was by necessity schematic and generalized, than in the sketch's attitude, posture, and gestures, especially in the strangely dainty positions of the hands. Glamour once resided so emphatically in the stance of the model that the faces in the illustrations cannot really be said to have expressions at all, but angles or tilts. The chin raised upwards in a haughty look; the eyes lowered in an attitude of introspection; the head cocked at an inquisitive or coquettish angle; or the profile presented in sharp outline, emanating power the severity like an emperor's bust embossed on a Roman coin.
Abbas Rajabpour necessity schematic It is not "necessity schematic". "By necessity" is a sort of two-word adverb. The faces were schematic because it was necessary that they be that way.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
Abbas Rajabpournecessity schematic
It is not "necessity schematic". "By necessity" is a sort of two-word adverb. The faces were schematic because it was necessary that they be that way.
Abbas Rajabpourgeneralized
This only means that the features of the faces were not those of any identifiable person.