Please explain the meaning of the following sentence "Britain suffered far fewer losses and less destruction, but you can’t blame it for maintaining a strong navy and mobilizing for the defense of the home islands, thus discouraging Hitler from ordering a land invasion" . Britain suffered few losses but how could the losses be blamed for a strong navy?
Interpret the sentence this way. "Britain suffered far fewer losses and less destruction, but you can’t blame Britain for maintaining a strong navy and mobilizing for the defense of the home islands, thus discouraging Hitler from ordering a land invasion" ie Britain had justification for maintaining a strong navy . .
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
Interpret the sentence this way.
"Britain suffered far fewer losses and less destruction, but you can’t blame Britain for maintaining a strong navy and mobilizing for the defense of the home islands, thus discouraging Hitler from ordering a land invasion"
ie Britain had justification for maintaining a strong navy . . .