Meaning

he hasn't come back to home since last year is incorrect but he hasn't come back home since last year would be fine.
he hasn't been back home since last year is fine.
There is little difference in meaning, although the second would be far more usual. The first could really only be used by someone who l

First of all, I think you mean "He hasn't come back tohome [...] ". You don't go to home. You just go home.

I think the first sentence (already corrected) indicates the act itself of "coming back home", whereas the second one simply points to "being back home". It's basically to be there, not to come.

MrGuedesBut the same thing wouldn't happen with a sentence like "He hasn't been backhome since last year". Here, if there is no "back" word, it doesn't imply that you come home from the outside. Here, you could be home for the entire year, without ever leaving, so, you could be home during the year, but without ever coming back to it during that year.

I didn't

what's difference between ' He hasn't been back & hasn't been home...' ?

Well, I may be wrong, because I'm not a native speaker of English, but I think the word "back" implies a return. So, "He hasn't been back home since last year" means he hasn't returned home since last year, and it would have roughly the same meaning as "He hasn't come back home since last year".

Yet, if we omit the word "back", and say simply "

MrGuedeswould be that he has always been home over this year and last year, so he has never come back to it, because he has never left it. In that case, you could say "He hasn't come back home since last year"

Thank your for your explanations,but this part seems illogical cause when we say someone has always been home and has never left it we could simply say