0Dear teachers,02br 02br 00Would you please explain these ideas to me?02br 02br 00For thirty years now I have been studying my fellow-men. I do not know very much about them. I should certainly hesitate to engage a servant on his face, and yet I suppose it is on the face that for the most part we judge the persons we meet. We draw our conclusions from the shape of the jaw, the look in the eyes, the contour of the mouth. I wonder if we are more often right then wrong. Why novels and plays are so often untrue to life is because their authors, perhaps of necessity, 01b00(1) make their characters all of a piece02b00. 01b00(2) They cannot afford to make them02b00 self-contradictory, for then they become incomprehensible, and yet self-contradict is what most of us are. We are a haphazard bundle of inconsistent qualities.02br 02br 001a) = each character had a temperament without nuances, changes, weaknesses, contradictions... 02br 00b) all characters were given the same temperament, they all looked the same.02br 02br 002a) Writers could not allow the characters to be self-contradictory;02br 00b) Writers could allow themselves to make their characters self-contradictory.02br 02br 00Many thanks,02br 00Hela0-
Top answer
01 = each character had a temperament without contradictions02br 02br 002 = Writers could not allow the characters to be self-contradictory0-
— Mister Micawber
01 = each character had a temperament without contradictions02br 02br 002 = Writers could not allow the characters to be self-contradictory0-
Free · every Monday
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.