02br10"... for me who is ..." : Is this construction, without a comma between "me" and "who" possible anywhere at all?02br
12br
10For me, who is always so sensitive to protocols, the way the ceremony has been conducted is hard to accept.12br
12blockquote
02i 02br 02br 00You need the comma. Lacking the comma, you create a restrictive clause. That means you think there's more than one me, and you're trying to specify which me you mean in the restrictive clause.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.