Many people believe that animal testing is necessary for the convenience of human life, while others think that animal testing is cruel and should be stopped. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

This is day and age, we are living in a world where science research issue is heated topic and often discussed. While some many think that necessary of testing on animal bodies is useful for human life, others believe that there is an inhumanity and should be forbidden animal experiments. This essay will look at both standpoints and explain the reasons behind my opinion.

It is true that many people condemn activities that using the animal to try new studying and should be banned for the following reasons. First and foremost, they argue that each animal body is also a living body and they have rights as the human, they are loved, happy, freedom and especially not hurt. Therefore, scientists begin their research had to confine and practice surgeries hurtling little animal. This thing is harmful impact to both their spiritually and physically and even dead. Moreover, nowadays, from the perspective of animal protection activists, researchers devised advanced techniques which using computer could make formulas and predictions risk for experiments. Therefore, experts don’t need animal for their study, which are returned to natural forests.

On the other hand, those who support to put to the test on animal bring more convincing arguments to the table. This could be behind argument is that animals like rabbits, mouse, cats, in particular monkeys, which correlate with human led to examine conclusions more accurate. In addition, many other individuals fear that, the research results are directly applied for person, which not try on animal, could result in a variety of disasters that might change gene, catastrophe and death. This is actually inhuman that means to protect hundreds of animal while thousands person happens trouble medically. Research activities could become more philanthropic when scientists incorporate animal testing with technicality, which could reduce the number of animal using for analysis.

In conclusion, I agree that experiments should be implemented on animal before the much-publicized pronouncement and also bring to benefit for human life.