0
Usenet Posted 21 years ago
Usage

ManU Boycott

I see that the Manchester United fans have called a boycott on the team's sponsors to register their displeasure over ManU not being locally owned. The sponsors that will be boycotted are United's main sponsors: Nike, Vodafone, Budweiser, Pepsi, Audi and Fuji. Evidently, they are not boycotting any local sponsors.

I was dumbstruck noticing "Budweiser" on this list. I was under the impression that Budweiser was generally shunned by all but the young and trendy in the UK. I can't imagine a ManU fan ordering a pint of Bud.
My assumption is that they are refusing to purchase a product that they would otherwise refuse to purchase. It seems that it would very difficult to judge the effectiveness of the boycott.

When the initial flap arose over Glazer's ownership of controlling interest in United, there were a number of fears expressed by United fans about what negative effects this ownership might result in. I would think that one of the fears would be that Glazer might go after an American product like Budweiser for sponsorship. It would be an embarrassment for a United fan to participate in anything that promoted something like Budweiser as a beer of choice.

However, it seems that Budweiser was a major sponsor of United before Glazer became involved. Strange people, these Brits.

Tony Cooper
Orlando FL
  

Top answer

snip [nq:1]However, it seems that Budweiser was a major sponsor of United before Glazer became involved. [/nq] Strange people these ManU supporters, you mean. Outside their own strange little world, they've attracted largely zilch popular support for their whinging: they've been happy for years for the club to sell out and buy their way to success, and as far as I know, nobody else is shedding any tears for them.

  • snip [nq:1]However, it seems that Budweiser was a major sponsor of United before Glazer became involved.
  • [/nq] Strange people these ManU supporters, you mean.
  • Outside their own strange little world, they've attracted largely zilch popular support for their whinging: they've been happy for years for the club to sell out and buy their way to success, and as far as I know, nobody else is shedding any tears for them.
  • Cheers, Harvey Canada for 30 years; S England since 1982.
  • van)
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

132 Answers
0
snip
[nq:1]However, it seems that Budweiser was a major sponsor of United before Glazer became involved. Strange people, these Brits.[/nq]
Strange people these ManU supporters, you mean.
Outside their own strange little world, they've attracted largely zilch popular support for their whinging: they've been happy for years for the club to sell out and buy their way to success
0
[nq:1]I see that the Manchester United fans have called a boycott on the team's sponsors to register their displeasure over ... shunned by all but theyoung and trendy in the UK. I can't imagine a ManU fan ordering a pintof Bud.[/nq]
Actually, Bud is one of the brands favoured by the you-aren't-having-fun-till-you've-puked-your-ring crowd. That tendency don't tend to hold leading positions in t
0
[nq:1]However, it seems that Budweiser was a major sponsor of United before Glazer became involved. Strange people, these Brits.[/nq]
Bud sponsors anything that'll let it. Constant advertising is the only way they can get anyone over here to drink it.
Adrian
0
[nq:2]However, it seems that Budweiser was a major sponsor of United before Glazer became involved. Strange people, these Brits.[/nq]
[nq:1]Bud sponsors anything that'll let it. Constant advertising is the only way they can get anyone over here to drink it.[/nq]
That's nonsense, not surprisingly. We see far more adverts from the Guinness makers here than from Anheuser Busch, yet more and m
0
[nq:1]I reckon a boycott by Man U supporters would be noticed, if anybody gives a flying one.[/nq]
For the latest on this flap, see a long article at http://soccernet.espn.go.com/headlinenews?id=334675&cc=5901 . `
0
[nq:2]I reckon a boycott by Man U supporters would be noticed, if anybody gives a flying one.[/nq]
[nq:1]For the latest on this flap, see a long article at http://soccernet.espn.go.com/headlinenews?id=334675&cc=5901 . `[/nq]
Protest organizations are notoriously stupid about
0
[nq:2]I reckon a boycott by Man U supporters would be noticed, if anybody gives a flying one.[/nq]
[nq:1]For the latest on this flap, see a long article at http://soccernet.espn.go.com/headlinenews?id=334675&cc=5901 .[/nq]
Yes. But it'll fizzle out in a few months. People li
0
[nq:1]Yes. But it'll fizzle out in a few months. People like watching sports, and will go on doing so. The ... I don't really see how that could be successful, and the fans would certainly desert a club which tried. `[/nq]
Harlem Globetrotters?

John Dean
Oxford
0
[nq:2]Yes. But it'll fizzle out in a few months. People ... the fans would certainly desert a club which tried. `[/nq]
[nq:1]Harlem Globetrotters?[/nq]
As it happens, I was originally thinking of mentioning them by name, but apart from anything else couldn't remember how to spell them. If Glazer thinks that would work in a sort of super-Packer thing, I reckon his acumen has forsaken him.
0
[nq:1]think, a and[/nq]
[nq:2]Harlem Globetrotters?[/nq]
[nq:1]As it happens, I was originally thinking of mentioning them by name, but apart from anything else couldn't remember how to spell them. If Glazer thinks that would work in a sort of super-Packer thing, I reckon his acumen has forsaken him.[/nq]
Glazer has not made any noticeably dumb moves with the Tampa Bay Bucs. The team i

Related Questions