0
Theooo Posted 18 years ago
Grammar

Long since

this question is on the SAT OG book page 661 # 29 One of the brackets contains an error.
The dolls in the collection, [all] [more than] two hundred years old, had been [carefully] carved for children [long since] gone.

Why isn't [long since] wrong? And can you please explain the usage of [more than]? When can it be used and when is it wrong?

Thanks in advance"
  

Top answer

Hi, this question is on the SAT OG book page 661 # 29 One of the brackets contains an error. The dolls in the collection, [all] [more than] two hundred years old, had been [carefully] carved for children [long since] gone. Why isn't [long since] wrong?

  • Hi, this question is on the SAT OG book page 661 # 29 One of the brackets contains an error.
  • The dolls in the collection, [all] [more than] two hundred years old, had been [carefully] carved for children [long since] gone.
  • Why isn't [long since] wrong?
  • And can you please explain the usage of [more than]?
  • When can it be used and when is it wrong?
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

4 Answers
0
Hi,

this question is on the SAT OG book page 661 # 29 One of the brackets contains an error.
The dolls in the collection, [all] [more than] two hundred years old, had been [carefully] carved for children [long since] gone.

Why isn't [long since] wrong? And can you please explain the usage of [more than]? When can it be used and when is it wrong?

I don't see any erro
0
Changing all to "EACH more than 200 years old" eliminates the ambiguity. Since there's no other error in the sentence, it much be [all]
0
Anonymousambiguity
Emotion: tongue tied

I don't see the ambiguity in All of the dolls are more t

Related Questions