Hi. I'm a Japanese university student, working on my graduation thesis. I'm studying locative inversion with modal auxiliary verb, such as (1-3). (locative inversion consists of <locative phrase+verb+subject>,and its derivative <ing+locative phrase+be+subject>, by my definition. )
(1)Sitting on the stump {will/ may/ can/ should/ must} be a great big toad.
(2)In the caves {will/ may/ can} hide a fierce lion. (3)Down the hill {will/ may/ can} roll the baby carriage.
Are these sentences acceptable? If you think acceptable, which modal aux will be a top, and which will be a low? If you think unacceptable, what contexts are required to make these sentences acceptable? (As for (2) and (3), a sperker or writer who states (2) guesses a present situation, and a speaker in (3) guesses a future situation.)
I have a poor intuition to English, so would you be my informants? Of cource, I don't mind your answering my questions according to your feeling!
Top answer
uh? a responce to test.
— Ksksk
uh?
a responce to test.
Free · every Monday
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.