0 This is another sentence from an English learner's magazine. 02br 00It is from an on-air interview with a financial adviser. 02br 02br 00'For those listening out there, what do you think is the first step to financial literacy.' 02br 02br 00Please tell me if it contains errors. 02br 00Please also tell me of ways in which it could be improved. 02br 02br 00Thanks in advance. 02br 00Mr C.N. 0-
Top answer
0It needs a question mark. 0-
— Mister Micawber
0It needs a question mark.
0-
Free · every Monday
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
0 It seems fine as is. You could change it, of course, in thousands of ways, but whether any of these would constitute improvement is a moot point. 02br 02br 00CJ 0-
0I presume that the bone of contention might be: 02br 02br 00'what do you think is the first step' vs 'what do you think the first step is'. 02br 02br 02br 00I'd say six of one and half a dozen of the other. 0-
0 Grammatically fine, and often used, but is it fine conceptually? 02br 02br 02br 00The question would not be for anyone other than listeners, would it? 02br 02br 00'For those not listening out there, what do you think is the first step to financial literacy?' 02br 02br 00Bear in mind, it is to be used by students of English.
0 lol, thanks - that is the kind of input I was after. 02br 02br 00I hope I am not being too picky, but wouldn't; 02br 00'For the benefit of our audience ... .', be a significant improvement? 02br 02br 00I also wonder whether 'financial literacy' is not a strange expression. 02br 02br 00Bear in mind that it is to be used by
0 I think I would call the question 'What do you think is the first step to financial literacy?' a rhetorical question, meaning one that is asked but not expected to be answered by the audience, especially since they are 'out there'--unless it's a call-in show, and the speaker is waiting until he gets a call-in answer, before he proceeds with the discussion. 02br 02br 00Other