0
JungKim Posted 10 years ago
Grammar

Light verb

According to Wikipedia, a https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Light_verb is defined as follows:
In linguistics, a light verb is a verb that has little semantic content of its own and it therefore forms a predicate with some additional expression, which is usually a noun. Common verbs in English that can function as light verbs are do, give, have, make, take, etc.

I'd like to know if this "have" is a light verb.
I have a really good feeling about this.
  

Top answer

" a. Sam did a revision of his paper. - Light verb construction b.

  • " a.
  • Sam did a revision of his paper.
  • - Light verb construction b.
  • Sam revised his paper.
  • -Full verb a.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

26 Answers
0
This is from the Wiki article, comparing these "light verbs" with "full verbs."

a. Sam did a revision of his paper. - Light verb construction
b. Sam revised his paper. -Full verb
a. Larry wants to have a smoke. - Light verb construction
b. Larry wants to smoke. - Full verb
a. Jim made an important claim that.... - Lig
0
Thanks for taking the time to look into the examples.
You're right that it has a full-verb counterpart.
That said, I find that all the light verb examples in the article happen to be dynamic verbs as opposed to 'stative verbs'.

But the OP's verb 'have', I think, is a stative verb.

Am I mistaken about this?

Or even if I'm right about that, does it really matter t
0
JungKimBut the OP's verb 'have', I think, is a stative verb.
"Have" is not always a stative verb.
0
AlpheccaStars"Have" is not always a stative verb.
I'm not saying that it always is. What I saying is that it is in this particular case, I think.
Do you think that it's a stative verb in the OP?
0
JungKimDo you think that it's a stative verb in the OP?
I do.
0
fivejedjon JungKimDo you think that it's a stative verb in the OP?I do.
If it's a stative verb, can it still be considered a light verb?
I mean, being a stative verb, 'have' means its original full meaning of possessing.
Can you say just because you have a full-verb equivalent (I feel really good about this) that the 'have' in the OP is a "light
0
Well, to me, I don't possess my feelings in the same "heaviness" that I possess my toothbrush.
I can sell or discard my toothbrush. Then I don't possess it anymore. My toothbrush and I are totally separate from each other. I either own it, or I don't. But my feelings cannot be divorced from me as a toothbrush can. It would be rather strange to say "I don't have my feelings now; I gave them
0
Hi

After a while, I think I've understood:

- I have a good feeling about this
- I feel good about this

On the face of it, 'have' isn't needed here, because the two sentences say the same thing. So 'have', in this context, is a light verb. We can drop 'have'

Obviously, in other contexts, we couldn't just drop 'have' because it is serving as a main verb:
0
dave_anon- I have a good feeling about this- I feel good about this
Cf.

I have a good inkling about this.
I inkle good about this.
0
Yes, so in some contexts, you can't drop the 'have'

There are some noun/verb constructs where you can drop the light verb and there are some where you can't

- I'm OK, I have work right now
- I'm OK, I work right now

I wasn't supposing for a moment that I could tell you when the rule operates

Dave

Related Questions