Let's have lunch [with] just the two of us
It'd be a waste to let the food get cold after all, so let's get to it without further ado and have lunch with just the two of us.
I think "would you have lunch with me" and "can I have lunch with you" is reasonable, without the subject in "with" phrase.
But "let's have lunch with just the two of us." doesn't sound to me reasonable.
I think it should have been "let's have lunch just the two of us" without "with."
I was wondering if I have a right idea.
Top answer
park sang joon It'd be a waste to let the food get cold after all, so let's get to it without further ado and have lunch with just the two of us. It is fine. It means that you don't expect your other lunch companions to show up before the food is cold.
- park sang joon It'd be a waste to let the food get cold after all, so let's get to it without further ado and have lunch with just the two of us.
- It is fine.
- It means that you don't expect your other lunch companions to show up before the food is cold.
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
park sang joonIt'd be a waste to let the food get cold after all, so let's get to it without further ado and have lunch with just the two of us.
It is fine. It means that you don't expect your other lunch companions to show up before the food is cold.
0After all, It'd be a waste to let the food get cold, so let's get to it and have lunch, just the two of us.
0
Related Questions