No, such analogies don't usually work in English. Each verb has its own idiosyncrasies.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
Mister MicawberNo, such analogies don't usually work in English. Each verb has its own idiosyncrasies.I couldn't find let go of in Shakespeare, but I did find tthis:
Mister MicawberThat doesn't mean that 'let go of' was incorrect 400 years ago (if we care).It's not in King James either. We may not care, but that
Mister MicawberIf it's not in Shakespeare or King James. it must have been considered ungrammatical. -- I think that your logic is faulty.Given its non-occurrence in 3,000,000 words of exemplary writings and its innate illogicality,.I would surmise that it is an embalmed illiteracy from a later era. So I'll probably stop using it in my own writings.
Mister MicawberAnd will you start using 'Come, let's away about it' and 'Let's on our way in silent sort'?[/quote
I won't be adopting any phrases from Shakespeare or the New York Times. I would never use a phrase like "let go of an obsessive need to". "Let go of " weapons? What about relinduished, abandoned, renounced, forworn?