Every time I've been there led to see nothing.
Is the sentence above grammatical?
No.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
It would be more or less okay with an "ing" added to "see": "Every time I've been there led to seeing nothing."
tkacka15Every time I've been there led to see nothing.
Is the sentence above grammatical?
I'd say it's grammatical, but adding 'only' makes it clearer that it is grammatical. Nevertheless, it's somewhat cryptic with regard to meaning, and it may not even mean what you intended.
Every time I've been led there, only to see nothin